<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;A: Is There A &#8216;Safe Level&#8217; for Peanut in Foods?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2011/10/16/qa-is-there-a-safe-level-for-peanut-in-foods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2011/10/16/qa-is-there-a-safe-level-for-peanut-in-foods/</link>
	<description>The magazine for those living with food allergies, celiac disease, asthma and pollen allergies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterBay</title>
		<link>http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2011/10/16/qa-is-there-a-safe-level-for-peanut-in-foods/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allergicliving.com/?p=11754#comment-744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with AFran.  With all do respect, I do NOT want a manufacturer being able to decide what is or isn&#039;t safe...and I am confused by this whole study, to be honest.  Everyone reacts to allergens differently.  And what about the people who are more sensitive?  Perhaps the first 20 times they consume these trace amounts they are outwardly ok - but then they react?  Labeling regulations definitely need to improve, but I don&#039;t think this is the way to do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with AFran.  With all do respect, I do NOT want a manufacturer being able to decide what is or isn&#8217;t safe&#8230;and I am confused by this whole study, to be honest.  Everyone reacts to allergens differently.  And what about the people who are more sensitive?  Perhaps the first 20 times they consume these trace amounts they are outwardly ok &#8211; but then they react?  Labeling regulations definitely need to improve, but I don&#8217;t think this is the way to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFran</title>
		<link>http://allergicliving.com/index.php/2011/10/16/qa-is-there-a-safe-level-for-peanut-in-foods/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>AFran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allergicliving.com/?p=11754#comment-742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I&#039;d be quite concerned about the supposed 1% of the population for whom a safe threshold could not be determined.  As much as I despise the current proliferation of &quot;CYA&quot; warnings, they do allow the allergic community to make the decision themselves as to whether they are willing to take the risk of consuming a given food.

What I&#039;d prefer to see is a standardization of warnings in terms of what they actually mean, and have them be mandatory, not voluntary.  I think this would go further in terms of improving quality of life for FA individuals - and it would address the plight of the MFA, not those with just PA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I&#8217;d be quite concerned about the supposed 1% of the population for whom a safe threshold could not be determined.  As much as I despise the current proliferation of &#8220;CYA&#8221; warnings, they do allow the allergic community to make the decision themselves as to whether they are willing to take the risk of consuming a given food.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d prefer to see is a standardization of warnings in terms of what they actually mean, and have them be mandatory, not voluntary.  I think this would go further in terms of improving quality of life for FA individuals &#8211; and it would address the plight of the MFA, not those with just PA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
